Julie Banderas thinks she is familiar with what she’s speaking about simply because she did in fact graduate from faculty with a degree, but her diploma isn’t really in the legislation, which is obvious from her job interview with previous Deputy Assistant Attorney Standard Tom Dupree on Fox “Information” Monday.
The place of this clip seems to be to mislead Fox viewers into contemplating the indictments from Trump are political and attacking his proper to no cost speech, an concept that is getting traction amongst Republicans who are desperately grasping at any smaller straws they can maintain on to to continue to keep worshipping their hero.
Banderas introduced into a litany against Fulton County District Legal professional Fani Willis.
“The legal professional [in Fulton County], Fannie [sic] Willis, is probing no matter whether Trump dedicated crimes in making an attempt to overturn the election success in Ga. Committing crimes, ok?” she led off. “I want to talk about Trump’s alleged crimes for a 2nd.”
Okay, Julie. Let’s speak about the 71 counts he is at present billed with in 3 various venues, before we get to regardless of what Fani Willis may perhaps want to do.
“He hasn’t been indicted with incitement, we know that, right?” she questioned rhetorically. And she’s proper, since that would be one thing that may possibly impinge on his free speech legal rights.
“So it is really not a criminal offense to tell lies.” Accurate, for the causes stated earlier mentioned.
“Becoming a narcissist just isn’t a criminal offense.” Probably not, but it really is a crime waiting around to happen if the narcissist has his moi bruised in any way, like say, dropping an election.
“Hatching strategies to stay in office environment is not a crime.” SHE Practically Gets IT, BUT MISSES THE MARK. Julie, Julie, Julie. Scheming in by itself may possibly not be a criminal offense, but performing on it IS, and that is particularly what the person is becoming charged with. He can fantasize all working day extensive about remaining in place of work, but the day those bogus elector slates strike the National Archives it was a full-blown conspiracy to steal an election.
Just about as an afterthought, she included, “And declaring you gained an election that you know you shed is not a criminal offense.” Also real, until the objective of accomplishing so is in furtherance of the underlying conspiracy to steal the election and keep in office environment.
Now I know these matters since I do not watch Fox Information, and because I go through the genuine files with my have eyes and can make a distinction in between the stating of points and the performing of factors. I am not a attorney, but the paperwork are really very clear.
What Fox Information is executing here is despicable. Bolstering Trump is negative adequate, but misinforming their viewers into believing this isn’t really definitely about everything other than political speech should to be a crime in itself. Regretably, it truly is not a crime to lie to tens of millions of folks, irrespective of whether it is Fox Information or Donald Trump.
[h/t Justin Baragona]
