In April 2023, Wisconsin Republicans were apoplectic after Janet Protasiewicz was elected to the Wisconsin Supreme Court. Their hissy matches and mood tantrums hit their crescendo later in the summer season when a progressive law firm took gain of the political change in the court and filed a lawsuit pertaining to the excessive gerrymandering of the legislative district maps.
Even now, practically a full 12 months afterwards, they are nevertheless owning conniptions, even when they get what they want.
Just after the state supreme courtroom experienced ruled that the state’s legislative maps have been unconstitutional, the Elias Law Business submitted a movement to check with the courtroom to revisit the congressional district maps. The Republicans went into meltdown manner as soon as all over again and demanded that Protasiewicz recuse herself.
On Friday, the court turned down the movement. Protasiewicz had in fact sat out on the selection, not from recusal but merely mainly because she had not been on the bench when the authentic case was listened to. But even however they conservatives acquired what they wished, they just couldn’t convey themselves to act like grownups, a great deal fewer like even tempered justices:
“This movement arrives as no shock just after the court’s new bulk telegraphed its willingness to rebalance political electric power in the point out of Wisconsin by overturning Johnson v. Wisconsin Elections Commission,” conservative Justice Rebecca Bradley wrote in the buy, referencing the court’s preceding determination on the maps.
“Although the court docket rightfully denies this movement,” she included, “it probable would not be extensive until eventually the new vast majority flexes its political power all over again to progress a partisan agenda in spite of the destruction inflicted on the independence and integrity of the court docket.”
[…]
The court docket in its determination did not directly handle the theory. But Bradley and Ziegler in their concurrence explained the liberal majority’s “reckless abandonment of settled legal precedent” in the December legislative maps circumstance on which the movement was based “incentivizes litigants to provide politically divisive instances to this court no matter of their authorized merit.”
I would remind the light reader that equally Ziegler and Bradley are on the bench only staying wholly owned subsidiaries of the conservative income tank, Wisconsin Companies and Commerce (WMC). And that each justices have ruled on many circumstances from which they should really have recused them selves, had they not adopted new regulations about recusals which ended up penned by – wait for it!! – WMC.
I tell you, you just won’t be able to make this shit up any longer. I just hope the Elias Law Agency decides to go after the matter all over again utilizing a distinctive route. It is really truly a obvious lower scenario, as was the legislative district maps.
